UPSC Prelims 2017— Question 53

This question from the 2017 Civil Services Preliminary Examination tests Ancient India, under History. The central concept is Buddhist Schools. Sautrantika and Sammitiya were Buddhist schools, not Jain sects. Sarvastivada is a Buddhist school associated with the proposition that phenomena have existence across the three times in a qualified doctrinal sense rather than being simply momentary. The safest way to approach this type of UPSC question is to identify the exact institutional, historical, geographical, scientific or economic proposition being tested and then examine every statement or option independently. A statement should not be accepted merely because it contains a familiar term; the qualifier, scope, date, institution and purpose must all be correct. This is particularly important where the answer choices combine several statements. Statement 1 is incorrect. It changes or overstates the relevant fact, institution, scope, chronology or mechanism, so it cannot be accepted as a correct proposition. Statement 2 is correct. It is consistent with the established concept described above and does not introduce a false institutional, chronological, geographical or definitional qualifier. Option-wise analysis: Option A: This is incorrect. It either accepts a statement that is not supported, rejects a statement that is correct, or identifies the wrong institutional, historical, geographical or scientific association. The error is therefore substantive rather than merely terminological. Option B: This is the correct answer. It matches the verified combination or proposition required by the question and is consistent with the underlying concept explained above. Option C: This is incorrect. It either accepts a statement that is not supported, rejects a statement that is correct, or identifies the wrong institutional, historical, geographical or scientific association. The error is therefore substantive rather than merely terminological. Option D: This is incorrect. It either accepts a statement that is not supported, rejects a statement that is correct, or identifies the wrong institutional, historical, geographical or scientific association. The error is therefore substantive rather than merely terminological. Prelims takeaway: Focus on the exact wording of the proposition, especially restrictive words such as “only”, “all”, “always”, “steadily”, “necessarily”, and references to a particular ministry, institution, law or geographical location. For statement-based questions, determine the truth value of each statement before looking at the combination codes. For direct questions, identify the defining feature of the concept and eliminate options that belong to a related but different concept. This method reduces dependence on guesswork and makes elimination more reliable.