UPSC Prelims 2022— Question 50

This question belongs to Environment & Ecology and tests Miyawaki Method. The concept has to be interpreted through ecological processes, environmental governance or species-level facts. UPSC often combines one familiar ecological statement with a subtly overbroad or geographically incorrect statement. Option C is the keyed answer because Creation of mini forests in urban areas is the combination or identification that satisfies the conditions in the question. A useful way to solve the question is to separate the individual propositions from the answer-code combinations. A statement can look broadly reasonable while still being incorrect because it uses an absolute term, assigns a function to the wrong institution, confuses two related concepts, or places a feature in the wrong region or period. The keyed response should therefore be treated as the outcome of checking each proposition rather than as a memory-only exercise. Option A: Promotion of commercial farming in arid and semi-arid areas — this is not the correct choice. It fails the question's test because it does not represent the required combination, institution, location, mechanism or historical association. The distractor is plausible only if a related concept is confused with the one actually asked. Option B: Development of gardens Using genetically modified flora — this is not the correct choice. It fails the question's test because it does not represent the required combination, institution, location, mechanism or historical association. The distractor is plausible only if a related concept is confused with the one actually asked. Option C: Creation of mini forests in urban areas — this is the correct choice under the final key. It matches the relevant Miyawaki Method principle and satisfies the question's wording. Option D: Harvesting wind energy on coastal areas and on sea surfaces — this is not the correct choice. It fails the question's test because it does not represent the required combination, institution, location, mechanism or historical association. The distractor is plausible only if a related concept is confused with the one actually asked. The exam-oriented takeaway is to identify the governing fact first and only then map it to the answer code. This reduces errors caused by choosing an option because one individual statement appears familiar. For database use, the classification and explanation should be read together: the subject gives the broad domain, the topic identifies the recurring UPSC theme, and the subtopic records the precise knowledge point tested. This also makes the question useful for later topic-wise search and revision.