UPSC CIVIL SERVICES PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION
UPSC Prelims 2024— Question 4
Q4
Question
With reference to the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements: 1. A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its dissolution. 2. A bill passed by the Lok Sabha and pending in the Rajya Sabha lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. 3. A bill in regard to which the President of India notified his/her intention to summon the Houses to a joint sitting lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
AnswerOption B
Explanation
The correct answer is option (B). A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on dissolution. A bill passed by Lok Sabha but pending in Rajya Sabha also lapses. But a bill for which the President has notified an intention to hold a joint sitting does not lapse merely because Lok Sabha is dissolved. Thus statements 1 and 2 are correct. The key to this question is to distinguish the exact constitutional provision, factual association, scientific principle, or current-affairs detail being tested from statements that are partly true but incomplete or incorrectly framed. UPSC often makes the distractors plausible by changing one institutional role, date, classification, geographic association, or causal relationship. Option A — “1 only” is incorrect. It does not match the established fact or contains the incorrect combination, institution, relationship, classification, or proposition identified in the explanation above. Choosing it would therefore introduce a factual error or omit a necessary element. Option B — “1 and 2” is correct. It matches the established fact described above and gives the complete combination or identification required by the question. Option C — “2 and 3” is incorrect. It does not match the established fact or contains the incorrect combination, institution, relationship, classification, or proposition identified in the explanation above. Choosing it would therefore introduce a factual error or omit a necessary element. Option D — “3 only” is incorrect. It does not match the established fact or contains the incorrect combination, institution, relationship, classification, or proposition identified in the explanation above. Choosing it would therefore introduce a factual error or omit a necessary element. For examination purposes, the safest approach is to verify each statement independently before looking at the answer-code combination. This is particularly important in statement-based questions, because one false clause makes an entire combination wrong. In factual questions, compare the defining characteristic asked in the stem with each alternative rather than relying on superficial familiarity. The answer recorded here follows the verified Set C key used for this database.
Question Classification
SubjectPolity & Governance
TopicParliament
SubtopicBills
Question TypeStatement-based
Difficultydifficult
VerificationVerified